by Christian Attong
What do breeding dogs and sculpture have in common?
More than you might think.
Both begin with potential: a block of clay, a foundation bloodline. Both demand vision tempered by patience and persistence. Both require the individual to see not just what is, but what could be in time and through generations. And both teach the same fundamental lesson: mastery lies not in dramatic transformation, but in progressive refinement.
My background in digital sculpting, has shown me that these two disciplines share identical approaches. Historically, tradesmen guarded their methodologies like family secrets, creating competitive advantages through closely held knowledge and practice. This can be tracked in both these disciplines. Contrary to historical practice, I’ve often found that openly sharing concepts and thought processes, elevates everyone’s understanding without compromising trade specifics. In so doing, we can choose to avoid cyclical setbacks and progressively advance.
The following observations emerge from this intersection of two arts: one that shapes material, the other that shapes living genetic potential.
A new breeding program begins like a sculptor approaching a raw block of clay, ready to rough out a sculpture. This initial phase demands broad decisions: choosing foundation stock, establishing direction, crystallizing a vision for what a bloodline can become in time. The initial boundaries remain unpolished, filled with excitement and possibility, but also expected faults.
Instant perfection isn’t the goal here, nor should it be. The objective at this stage is to improve form, function, and type: establishing balance and structure through selective pairings and foundational choices to set the stage for a specimen that looks and moves closely to its standard. This serves as the base framework upon which all subsequent breeding decisions are built, setting a course toward a definitive vision that acts as the breeder’s guiding ideology, distant and aspirational, yet not fully actualized due to the infancy of the program.
As litters arrive and years pass, the breeder enters what sculptors know as the middle-detail stage where general forms begin to develop into specifics. At this stage, the breeder’s program reveals itself more clearly. Like a sculptor switching to finer tools, the breeder begins to make more informed decisions with intention, wanting to produce specific details across generations: angles and planes of head type, movement consistency, and temperament tendencies.
The breeder can begin to test combinations not just for obvious improvements, but for subtleties: better shoulder layback, second thigh development, correct ear set, expression, genetic diversity, predictability and consistency. This stage brings intimate knowledge of bloodlines that tend to complement each other rather than compete, resulting in harmonious partnerships instead of genetic dominance battles that offset balance.
We’ve all heard the comments: “This part is definitely from This Kennel, and that part from That Kennel.” The breeder should strive to produce a truly pleasing and balanced specimen that offers an initial ease in admiring its totality, not be immediately confronted by fragments of the whole.
As the program matures, the breeder then enters the fine-detail stage where continuous refinement and minor details push the boundaries between good and great. Many beginners are lured into starting here, drawn by the allure of “sexy virtues.” They gamble that luck might bypass the necessary considerations of sound structure and proper type.
For the experienced breeder, margins for error narrow dramatically. They work at the level of finishing strokes: eye set and color, tight lip lines inner drive, a quiet top line, correct coat texture, and those intangible qualities of presence and balance. The list of subtle details that are truly appreciated by the specialists are often sought at this stage. The refinement process never truly ends. Experience, feedback, and fresh perspectives must continually converge.
This is also where many feel compelled to start over when results disappoint and frustrations rise. But just as a sculptor doesn’t restart their masterpiece at every chip or flaw, neither should the experienced breeder abandon their work at every minor setback. Problems are inevitable. What separates experienced breeders from hobbyists is their ability to work through challenges: tracking them, confronting them, adjusting matings, or making difficult decisions to remove a dog from the program.
Refinement demands constant vigilance and the courage to reevaluate foundational choices, ensuring the program maintains harmony while striving for ever greater heights of excellence.
In the pursuit of excellence, breeders sometimes lose objectivity, getting too close to their work and failing to look beyond their program. They obsess over faults or hyper-focus on strengths that may lack generational staying power. The best breeders know when to step back, literally and figuratively. Only then may they be able to see the whole and identify weaknesses.
Prevention involves asking quality questions: Are we maintaining balance? Has one trait begun dominating at another’s expense? What are we losing while chasing a particular look?
Constructive input becomes crucial here. A mentor’s observation, a fellow breeder’s opinion, a judge’s critique, or even flipping a photograph of the dog vertically (an old artist’s trick for revealing compositional faults) can expose what familiarity has obscured. The brain adapts and begins overlooking what it sees repeatedly. Changing perspective refreshes our ability to truly see what is in front of us.
Unlike clay, a breeding program is a living and moving medium, shaped by intention, instinct, and perseverance, evolving with each generation. There are multiple levels and entry points to a program, and we should all understand that every breeder can be at varying stages.
Great breeders don’t always restart. They revise. They step back, study what is rather than obsessing over what should be and train their eyes to balance vision with realism. Sometimes even the most rewarding programs must take a step backward to move forward, reaching for that next level of refinement that seemed just beyond grasp.